Tuesday, October 25, 2005
SPECIAL CATEGORY: CAMPAIGN SIGNS THAT ARE QUESTIONABLE
These are signs that are located in sites of questionable legality. Reports have come in about the signs and they have been verified as being questionable in at least one of several aspects: whether the candidate/organization has had permission from the property owner — or whether they are on public property — or if there is an amorphous publc-private zone.
This blogsite owner (and co-participants in our Fair Sign endeavor) will check further; if they can not be verified as illegaly placed, the listing will be removed — or left in this questionable category if the sign(s) may be legal but the sign owner(s) can not provide reasonable evidence of permission. Such evidence would be a simple statement that so-and-so, property owner, said it is okay to place the sign.
NB: This is a voluntary effort to encourage fairness for all, not an attempt to call out, Gotcha!
Specifically:
PUEBLO signs promoting Grant House, Dianne Channing: 2 at the intersection of Carrillo and San Andres; (listed as questionable 10/25) - original (10/24) listing challenged by Harley Augustino as being on "the house side of the sidewalk."
Several Charles QUINTERO signs on Carillo Street, hillside;
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment