data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f60cf/f60cfe36046a47a9634ff96d3acbd2e899dda75b" alt=""
One new illegally-posted Grant House sign reported on La Cumbre Road, just south of Foothill. Another Police sign (Falcone, Horton, Redd) reported on Ontare by Foothill but not photographed.
Sunday update: Grant House wrote the sign would be removed and it is now removed.Continuing illegal signs remain:
for Falcone (at Chino/Micheltorena and on Quinto - both noted below);
for Tyler and Ebenstein on Las Positas and Tyler on E. Mission (both noted below);
for Quintero, all over town;
for PUEBLO, in various spots on the East and West sides;
How one posts one's campaign signs, one's personal advertising, probably will not influence substantially the number of votes received. But to the assistants in this effort for fairness for all contestants, that some candidates choose to flout the city ordinance is indeed interesting ... and suggestive of how they view us, their electorate.
(NB: We've been non-partisan and above-aboard: every time there's been a mention on this blogsite of an illegally-posted sign, a message was sent to the campaign in question to move or remove the sign.)
-------
End of the campaign season CAMPSIGN kudos (or lack therof) to the following campaigns, in order:
Dianne Channing — not one illegal sign seen or reported!
Marty Blum: one sign seen/reported and that was quickly removed;
Roger Horton: one sign seen/reported and that was quickly removed;
Loretta Redd: several illegally-posted signs early in the campaign; moved or removed on notice and none in the last weeks;
Grant House: more than several illegally-posted signs, but efforts, successful ones, made to move/remove the signs;
Lanny Ebenstein: initial positive responses and moving of illegally-posted signs but not subsequently;
Iya Falcone: initial reported signs (that caused there to be this blog) moved/removed; subsequently, no response or action;
Terry Tyler: no responses;
Charles/Carlos Quintero: not contacted — he has illegal signs all over town. There should be a requirement that contact information is clearly written on each campaign sign.
The two endorsing organizations, the Police Association and PUEBLO, were probably equal in the amount of illegal signage. In the last week, newly-placed PUEBLO signs have been on private property; however, a number of previously-noticed ones remain. As for the police signs, thanks to Loretta Redd, taking responsibility, contacting Sgt. McGrew, the illegal signs downtown were removed.
----------
This signage effort is almost over, although we will be looking around the polling places for illegal signage.(No signage allowed closer than 100 feet to a polling place.)
Our efforts apparently have had quite an effect in addition to annoying the campaigns. The amount of illegal signage is definitely down, despite this being an intense contest. For those who responded by moving the signs, thank you. For those who didn't, well....
"You can run with the big dogs or sit on the porch and bark." It's not totally clear which we sign bloggers are doing, running, nipping at the heels, or just barking, but, whichever, we're out there, watching, recording. We intend to continue this effort for fairness in other local elections.